OneWillRead

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Monday, July 15, 2013

800 Words: Depressive Paternalism - Part 1

Posted on 1:27 PM by Unknown
“No sane man can afford to dispense with debilitating pleasures; no ascetic can be considered reliably sane. Hitler was the archetype of the abstemious man. When the other krauts saw him drink water in the Beer Hall, they should have known he was not to be trusted.”


A.J. Liebling


“Those, no doubt, are in some way fortunate who have brought themselves, or have been brought by others, to obey some ultimate principle before the bar of which all problems can be brought. Single-minded monists, ruthless fanatics, men possessed by an all-embracing coherent vision do not know the doubts and agonies of those who cannot wholly blind themselves to reality.”


Isaiah Berlin


“This is going to be the most arrogant yet self-loathing post you’ll have ever read on this blog.”


Evan Tucker


To be sure, much of the evil done in this world is done by psychopaths and sociopaths who feel either pleasure or unconcern at the suffering of others. But they can only effect acts of evil by manipulating the rest of us, the 99% of us who feel normal emotions. Among those of us who do feel emotions as they’re supposed to be felt, is the evil carried out on behalf of a psychopath ever perpetrated by those of us lacking in busybodyness? Would we ever know how to effect it?


Psycho/sociopaths are certainly to be feared. But I think my antenna for sadism is relatively well-developed (as I’m sure anybody’s is with experience of childhood bullying). But at this point in my life, I don’t fear psychopaths half so much as do-gooders, who believe with all their hearts that the forces of virtue and light are their property. Within sociopathy, there are degrees, and for do-gooders to believe that they are on the side of virtue, while all those who disagree with them are on the side of evil and darkness, they inevitably have to hold some truly sociopathic elements within their makeup. It is never the Type B/executive dysfunction Hamlets among us who want to do nothing but good in this world, because we’re too beset by indecision to know what is good and what is bad. We can never act first and think later, because our actions outside our expertise are usually rather incompetent. But there are those others, the Type A’s, who believe they can use their surfeit of executive function to hammer the world into a more glorious place, and in order to make that more glorious world, they declare holy war on our indecision - because if depression is the disease of the Type-B, then anxiety is the disease of the Type-A. They seem to be competent in everything they touch, and therefore see no reason not to act first and think later. And because they never have to think about their actions, they’re too busy acting to ever stop to worry what their actions cause - they’re only worried about what happens when they don’t act. Such people will always be with the world, and the Type-B’s of our world know no more dangerous type of person, because there is nothing they will not do in the pursuit of meddling and molding other people into something more ‘good,’ which inevitably means something more like them. A state of which we type-B’ers are constitutionally incapable.


I can't deny that I meddle in other people’s deeply held beliefs all the time. On all manner of matter abstract, I can meddle with the best of them. I’ve known since I was a kid that I have an unwieldy talent for provocation and polemic, and I can’t deny that I somewhat enjoy the combativeness of my small attempts to use it to good effect, even if the heat of combativeness is inevitably a poor substitute for human warmth. But, unfortunately, it’s an ability I developed in a calderon. I’ve often thought to myself that my life is thus far defined by little more than a series of authority figures who thought they knew better than I what was best for me, and I had to defy them all with a full throat if I wanted any peace of mind. But unlike them, I never sought to mold other people in my image, and I never supposed I had that ability. So long as they don’t hurt me or the people I love, these Type-A’ers can petty-tyrant the world to their pure hearts’ contents. But nevertheless, being the type of person I am, I can’t help looking at them and seeing precisely what I think is wrong with the world. And it makes me a little sad to note that at this point in my life, few things give me more satisfaction than to ensure in no uncertain terms that they know what I think of them. I don’t apologize for having a prickly personality, and being the prick I am, I probably never will. To the best of our abilities, the world has to be made safe for people like me (and there are many). History is inevitably made by type-A’s, but the type-B’s are the only ones who can write it.


I’m a deeply, deeply flawed person. I biked twenty miles yesterday, but before I left I ate 7/8ths of a pint of Ben & Jerry’s ice cream, after I returned I had a Coke Slurpee, an enormous Chinese dish, and piece of particularly greasy pizza. I drink almost not at all these days, but it was only a month ago that five whiskeys was a normal Sunday night for me. For twelve years, I’ve been an on-and-off social smoker and am sorry to say that I’ve lately found the quasi-habit all too difficult to relinquish. At 31, I’ve already given myself acid reflux so heinous that it began to give me heart pain in my late teens, and has now given me shortness of breath and low blood pressure which in the last six months I’ve temporarily confused with a collapsed lung and a stroke (and yes, I’m reasonably certain it’s the gallons of salty food, not the few dozen cigarettes). Because I couldn’t work in other jobs or go for more schooling without terrible anxiety, I work nominally in a family business at which I have no talent and from which I’m increasingly disengaging with no regular line of work to occupy the lost time. I continue to live alone so I might spare others the inevitable bouts of self-loathing and panic attacks which make up any day filled with frustrations which other people can discard without a second thought. My failures with women are legion and legendary, and they increase by the month. I come from a background of mild privilege, and I’ve watched any number of peers significantly less intelligent than I rise to ultra-privileged success while my best achievements languish in a state of unreadness upon this miniscule slice of internet. It is a truth universally acknowledged that life is a perpetual state of change, and the situation of my life could change for the better by tomorrow morning. But for the moment, I’ve had to reconcile myself to the fact that I’m a person of very little practical use to the world.


In case you haven’t noticed, I’m a depressive - and a rather world-class one. I’ve learned through very hard self-training to conceal it in social situations, and I think I do a reasonably good job of it. But the mind of a person beset by depression is hydraulic. The longer an irrevocable depressive represses his inner darkness to will himself into positive thinking, the exponentially worse it grows. Depression is a mental cancer, a second organism locked in the same brain with a perfectly well-balanced, rational mind. The more well-balanced and rational a brain is, the more able it is to sift through the irrational directions which the brain orders. Bad thinking is very different from a lack of thinking - and the more irrational thoughts the rational self discards, the more those irrational directions will fester the unconscious, waiting to feast upon a mind too well-scrubbed by rationality to possess the necessary antibodies to bad thinking. Much noise has been made in recent years about the term ‘depressive realism,’ a term which supposedly describes how depression enables people to see the world more clearly. It is neither a true nor a false statement, it just a backward statement, and dangerously so. I very much believe that on the whole it’s true that depressed people are more able to see the world clearly than others, but never when depressed people exist within their states of depression. A mind that is too well disposed to rationality is a mind too susceptible to bad rationality. The illness depression most resembles is diabetes. Diabetes is a lifelong illness in which the pancreas fails to produce insulin - the transmitter which directs fats and carbohydrates to their proper place. Depression is a lifelong illness in which the brain fails to accept endorphins - a neurotransmitter which directs feelings of pleasure and satisfaction. Some pancreases are born lacking the ability to produce insulin, but some encounter too many carbohydrates and fats over a lifetime to continue to process them adequately. Similarly, some brains are simply born containing too much activity to process endorphins, but some brains achieve so much activity over the years that they lose their ability to process endorphins.


After twenty-three years of virulent semi-daily encounters with this disease, the primitiveness of the world’s thinking about depression still amazes and infuriates me - not only in attitude, but in research as well. The drugs which are available are of a primitiveness not to be believed - as poison in their own way as chemotherapy. There’s one drug family which I’ve had no choice but to take for more than ten years. Doctors warned me that I might experience weight-gain from an increase in appetite, but they never warned me that my appetite would increase to the point that my weight very nearly doubled between the ages of eighteen and twenty-five. And weight gain is hardly the worst of side effects, I was fourteen, I took a drug from another family which apparently caused me to exhibit extremely violent behavior - the memories of which will haunt me to my dying breath.  


Depression is a condition of life, not a mindset which positive thinking can supersede. I m generally of the opinion that depression is far closer to psychotic illnesses like schizophrenia and multiple personality disorder than is generally realized - and I worry that if the general public did realize that, the stigma of depression would grow ever greater. Depression is a shadow self which conquers a personality. It requires an innate mixture of inborn mental disorder and the trauma of a stressful life which hammers a brain out of equilibrium. In this manner, it’s no different than all manner of more serious illnesses. For example, it’s a common misconception that lower social classes are too busy to suffer from depression. Well, who knows? Maybe that’s true, because if it is, it’s the lower classes have it bad enough that their depression often metastasizes into far more serious mental illnesses.

And yet, because of the endless detritus which depression leaves in its wake, there are no end of so-called ‘well-meaning’ type-A meddlers who cause untold misery in the lives of depressives. It is a particularly tragic truth of life that Type-B’s cannot exist without type-A’s to clean up their messes. And yet this ‘cleaning’ comes at the most horrible price, because type-A’s will never, ever, forgive the type-B’s for an obtuseness about life which necessitates their intervention, and they inevitably perceive this obtuseness to be deliberate. Perhaps, they inevitably reason, if they instill enough terror into the hearts of type-B’s, particularly the depressives among them, they will be able to reverse their lives’ coarse and become a better busybody. And yet, no one in the world knows his faults better than a depressive, and reminding him of them, or exaggerating those faults, will only serve to bury depressives further within a tomb of their own misery.
Read More
Posted in 800 Words | No comments

Sunday, July 14, 2013

The Most Extraordinary Recording of Beethoven 9

Posted on 1:09 AM by Unknown
Click here

Truly extraordinary, but far from perfect. No recording is perfect. But this is the recording, for all its bizarre touches, which comes closest to my own conception. But the fact that I prefer this recording to just about all others troubles me very deeply. It comes from Nazi-era Netherlands, and the one quality, the only important quality, which this recording lacks is perhaps the most important quality of all - that final humanist glow which makes the 9th feel like a statement of love rather than coercion. I have no idea if the politics of a performance matter matter, there are Nazi-era recordings which have that glow in spades (for one, Furtwangler's famous 1942 performance of the Ninth, a conductor with far more conflicted feelings about the Nazi party than Mengelberg). The first three movements are beyond compare, and so is the last movement, but the tone of the performance is so utterly regimented, so commanding and dynamic, that it feels like a Beethoven 9 for Nuremberg, not humanity. 

Read More
Posted in Beethoven, mengelberg, Wilhelm Furtwangler | No comments

Friday, July 12, 2013

800 Words and Friday Playlist: Towards a Canon for the Rock Era Part 1

Posted on 1:35 AM by Unknown
Skinner: Reverend, this is Principal Skinner. I'm facing a crisis, and I didn't know to whom to turn …

Lovejoy: Well, maybe you should read your Bible.

Skinner: Um, any particular passage?

Lovejoy: Oh, it's all good.


"Canon" means many things to many people, but it literally means 'rule' in the sense of a measuring stick. The term, allegedly, comes from the end of the biblical era (New Testament), and it means a closed, authoritative collection. The canon is the yardstick by which the religious authorities and redactors measured closeness to God.

Those of us who have trouble with the idea of God nevertheless have our own canons. We may not believe in the Bible, but it's almost inevitable that there are moments in our lives when we turn to it for consolation, for wisdom, for transcendence, and for catharsis. The Bible has many, many passages that are just plain dull, and others that are downright offensive. Fortunately, we live in an era when we can ignore them...

But the truly glorious biblical excerpts - Exodus (at least chapters 1-24) and Genesis (just about all of it), Jonah and Isaiah (heavily edited), Jeremiah and Ezekiel, Jonah and the Song of Deborah, the Psalms and the Proverbs, Joel and Amos, Micah and Jonah, Ecclesiastes and Song of Songs (let it never be said that the Hebrews didn't know how to have a good time...), and the St. Mark Gospel... for obvious reasons, I never read as much of the New Testament, and what I read seemed to be not quite as interesting - are still some of the greatest literature we yet have. Even for a non-believer (especially?), these writings are every bit as moving, as challenging, and as beautiful as anything in Shakespeare or Beethoven. In the same way that I can hear Beethoven's Eroica Symphony in my head and know that obstacles can be overcome, or read Sonnet 29 (hopefully one day I can quote it from memory) to remember better days, so too could I turn to Psalm 23 or 27, and know hope and comfort, even if God won't be the one to provide it. Everyone has their own personal canon, comprised of works as close to our hearts as any family or close friend, and after sampling something from that canon, we can only hope that our demons can be purged, and life becomes that much easier to live.

(Text continued in Part 2...)

John Lennon: Imagine

Marvin Gaye: What's Going On

Aretha Franklin: Respect

Chuck Berry: Johnny B Goode

The Beatles: Hey Jude

Sam Cooke: A Change is Gonna Come

Bob Dylan: Blowin' in the Wind

The Beatles: Let It Be

The Beatles: In My Life

Curtis Mayfield: People Get Ready

The Beach Boys: God Only Knows

Tina Turner: River Deep, Mountain High

U2: One (under protest, and only when Johnny Cash sings it)

Martha & The Vandellas: Dancing in the Street

The Band: The Weight

Ray Charles: Georgia On My Mind

Simon & Garfunkel: Bridge Over Troubled Water

Percy Sledge: When a Man Loves a Woman

Bob Dylan: The Times They Are a-Changin'

Buffalo Springfield: For What It's Worth

Bob Marley: Redemption Song

Bob Dylan: Tangled Up in Blue

Dionne Warwick: Walk On By

Stevie Wonder: Superstition

Bob Dylan: Mr. Tambourine Man

Bruce Springstein: Thunder Road

Johnny Cash: Ring of Fire

The Mamas & The Papas: California Dreamin'

U2: I Still Haven't Found What I'm Looking For (goddamnit...)

Al Green: Love and Happiness

Creedence Clearwater Revival: Fortunate Son

Rolling Stones: You Can't Always Get What You Want

Stevie Wonder: Living For The City

Simon & Garfunkel: The Boxer

Van Morrison: Brown-Eyed Girl

Otis Redding: I've Been Loving You Too Long

The Drifters: Up On The Roof

Al Green: Take Me To The River

Ben E. King: Stand By Me

James Brown: It's a Man's World

Rolling Stones: Jumpin' Jack Flash

The Shirelles: Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow

(along with more songs...)
Read More
Posted in 800 Words, Friday Playlist, Non-Classical Music, Religion | No comments

Monday, July 8, 2013

800 Words: Pity the Dictator...

Posted on 6:00 PM by Unknown





It is said that no matter what other works of art he banned, Stalin never missed a performance of Boris Godunov. You would think that The Great Russian Opera would be the first to be censured by the Soviet Union - an opera about Russian tyrant who murdered his way to the throne, causes untold suffering to his people, and lives in perpetual terror of being held to account for his crimes. Even if this opera was about Czarist Russia, nobody could mistake the parallels to the Stalinist era. But at every performance, there was Stalin in his box, apparently listening quite intently. Even the stoniest heart of the century was moved to pity by the sight of his own soul’s reflection. So invested was he in Boris Godunov that he barred the Bolshoi’s music director, Nikolai Golovanov, from ever conducting again because Golovanov preferred a different bass for the role than Stalin’s favorite.


Brecht (rarely...) summed it up quite well: “How exhausting it is to be evil.” It is difficult to imagine that Stalin, the former seminary student who nearly became an Orthodox priest, could shed every last vestige of his former religious belief. Perhaps his psychopathy was untroubled, but it’s also possible to imagine him in his private gloom, awaiting the tumultuous hellfire which he knew was his ripe desert.


But historical figures like Stalin and Mao, as they existed in the twentieth century, are no longer possible. For the moment, there’s simply too much information and not enough means to collate it to gather useable dossier files after the manner of 20th century totalitarian states. In place of the totalitarian leader returns a creature both less and more lethal than the absolute monarch/dictator - the warlord. The warlord has no true power over his subjects in life, he only has power over them in death; and should the apparatus of war fall to pieces, so will he. Such is the lot of Bashar al-Assad, who has ceased to be an authoritarian dictator, he is now a warlord whose power is only demonstrable by the number of people he can kill.


Those of us who supported the Arab Spring have little to show for our beliefs thus far but an endless list of war crimes which will probably grow far more endless before the war ends. In the Syrian Civil War, there are as many as 120,000 dead, 130,000 missing, 1,500 foreign civilians killed, 1.2 million refugees, and 3 million internally displaced. The Syrian dictatorship as it existed before The Arab Spring exists no longer, nor could it ever. Syria is not an authoritarian state, it is chaos. And into that chaos was thrown a fifth of that country’s people, and who knows how many more millions will be thrown in before the chaos subsides?


Meanwhile, Egypt continues its dance upon an even deadlier volcano. Egypt’s elected president, Mohammed Morsi, was worse than a dictator, he was an incompetent would-be-dictator who attempted power seizures in the clumsiest possible manner. Even if he was elected, only way in which he could not be deposed by the Egyptian military was to entice the liberals to remain on his side - and yet he insisted on near-absolute constitutional power, and secular liberals left the Constituent Assembly (charged with drafting the new constitution) in disgust. No doubt, Morsi saw the example of Ayatollah Khomeini and thought that liberals could be casually brushed aside with a simple declaration the way Khomeini did in Iran. But the Egyptian revolution was built on far less solid ground than the Iranian one. The Iranian protests against the Shah involved as many as nine million people, whereas the protests against Mubarak were 2 million strong. Such was the hold of Khomeini’s charisma that upon his return to Iran, he was greeted by more than five million followers. Khomeini inspired so much devotion in his following that he could brush a liberal government aside with a wave of his hand, and no other Iranian had anything like the power to stop him.


Mohammed Morsi was never supposed to be president. He only became a candidate because the Egyptian military banned the candidacy of the Muslim Brotherhood’s deputy chairman - Khairad El-Shater. No one knows how any Islamist in Egypt could believe that an Islamic president could get away with giving himself dictatorial powers, but there should be no doubt that any Islamist President would have done the same. There are still more extreme Islamic parties in Egypt, powerful ones like the Salafist al-Nour party which got 28% of the vote. As much pressure as there was on Morsi to stay within the limits of constitutional law, there may have been still more pressure on him to become an Islamic dictator.


Meanwhile, the protests in Turkey have become so common that, in comparison to Egypt, the media has barely reported on them - seeing little difference in what’s happening in Turkey to what happened all over the Arab world. But what’s happened in Turkey is, in some ways, even more dramatic. Turkey’s protests against Prime Minister Erdogan have attracted at least 640,000 people. And when Erdogan definitively took violent action against the protests, it was the reverse of Mubarak. When Mubarak took action, it showed that he was a dictator no longer in control of the country he ruled with an iron fist. But when Erdogan took violent action against those who protested him, he officially was no longer a mere democratically elected leader - he became a would-be-dictator who rules by force. Mubarak is the authoritarianism of the past, Erdogan is the authoritarianism of the future. He was once the great hope for all of us who believed that political Islam needn’t be compatible with tyranny, but there can be no mistaking that Erdogan has opted for despotism. Over Erdogan’s time, Turkey has censored over a million websites, the country’s imprisoned over a hundred journalists, has bomed Iran and Iraq in violation of international law and continually threatens to bomb Syria, and killed as many as 60,000 Kurds (though probably half that). It’s possible, however unlikely, that Erdogan has plans to exploit the instability of the Islamic world to be its imperial overseer. No one has more to gain from the Arab Spring’s plunge into chaos than Erdogan. But how can Erdogan rule over all Islam he can’t even control his own country?


And finally, there’s the Israel/Palestine conflict. The third and definitive piece in the tic-tac-toe board of regional war. Where this perennial cause celebre goes, there will the world go. Syria is already in catastrophic Civil War, Egypt seems on the verge of it. All that’s required to become a regional conflict is for Civil War to occur in Israel/Palestine. One day, hopefully sooner rather than later, I’ll go into all the reasons why war between Israelis and Palestinians, or even war between Palestinian factions, remains the most lethal danger for the entire area - the difference between contained conflicts, or a war that could metastasize to literally any corner of the globe.


But even if it doesn’t, barely lower levels of instability circle the governments of Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Tunisia, and Bahrain. The entire Middle East is operating at a simmer, waiting for a match to strike the powder keg that will ignite it into the twenty-first century’s first grand conflict. If the rest of the world is wise, it won’t get too entangled. It’s the twenty-first century, but The Middle East looks very much like the beginning of the Thirty Years’ War, because no matter how militant and extreme a warlord gets, there is always someone whispering in his ear that he must become still more extreme, still more violent - or risk violence being done to him.


(The Grand Inquisitor Scene from Verdi's Don Carlo)
Read More
Posted in 800 Words, history, Politics, The Middle East | No comments

Friday, July 5, 2013

Friday Playlist: Benny Goodman (part 1)

Posted on 1:29 AM by Unknown


King Porter Stomp

Bartok: Contrasts (with the composer on piano and the great Joseph Szigeti on violin)

How High The Moon

Coconut Grove

The Man I Love

When the Sun Comes Out

Fable of the Rose

Shake Down the Stairs

Madhouse

House Hop

Swingtime in the Rockies

Jam Session

Goodbye

The Hour of Parting

Peckin'

Life Goes to a Party

Ridin' High

It's Always You

Darn That Dream

Down South Camp Meeting

Smoke Dreams

If Dreams Come True

Organ Grinder's Swing

Don't Be That Way

Yeah, Man

Music Hall Rag

Nitwit Serenade

Bugle Call Rag

Downhome Rag

Blue Moon

Limehouse Blues

I've Found a New Baby






Read More
Posted in Benny Goodman, Friday Playlist, Jazz, Non-Classical Music | No comments

Wednesday, July 3, 2013

800 Words: 30 Mini-Essays - 9. The American Carnival, 10. This IS The American Century

Posted on 3:08 PM by Unknown
9. The American Carnival


“… Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time handed out military command, high civil office, legions — everything, now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and circuses”


- Juvenal, Satire X


"...migrate from Greece and Ionia,
Cross out please those immensely overpaid accounts,
That matter of Troy and Achilles' wrath, and Aeneas', Odysseus' wanderings,
Placard "Removed" and "To Let' on the rocks of your snowy Parnassus, ...
The same on the walls of your German, French and Spanish castles, and Italian collections
For you know a better, fresher, busier sphere, a wide, untried domain awaits, demands you."

- Walt Whitman, Song of the Exposition



I have no idea what it means to be the ‘Greatest Country on Earth.’ I know that I’ve written that about America before, and having lived in only three countries (the other two for not very long), I have no real expertise on the subject, so I very much regret writing that. But I do know what excitement is, and I feel pretty safe in saying that even if America is not the best country on Earth, it’s certainly the most exciting. It should never cease to amaze how wrongly we Americans do many things, but we provide easily the best bread and circus show in the world.


The older I get, the dimmer grow my fantasies of living some kind of obscenely cultured life of daily concerts, theater, galleries, and symposia with the learned of the European continent which would turn George Steiner green with envy. The Europe of my imagination, indeed the Europe of most educated Americans’ imagination, ceased to exist a century ago when the lamps went out all over that continent, and we have not seen them lit again. But what those lamps illuminated was nothing but the European bread and circus show - perhaps still the greatest show the Earth has ever known. The working class was foundering in terrible factory conditions, the rural population starved terribly, but it was a non-stop party for the educated of Europe with ever new delights. The world was an endless place of discovery; new foods, new books, new music and art, new science. Life for an educated European was an endless profusion of new things to talk about.


But the pleasures innate to Europe have not changed much for a hundred years. In its place, Europe has become ever more Americanized. The Marshall Plan was not only a second chance for Europe, it was a second chance for America as well to get right all those things which wise American statesmen learned about proper governance over the course of 175 years. As a result of The Marshall Plan’s generosity, Europe was able to grow the kind of social safety net which America still desperately needs, and most Western European countries possess systems of government which are far more functional than America’s endless gridlock. If the EU ever succeeds (and the last few years proved that it clearly hasn’t yet...), it will have officially beaten America at its own game. Europe doesn’t need lamps, they have solar power.


But if the EU is a better place to live than America, then it has correspondingly less need for a great bread and circus show. European entertainment is certainly very good, and
I should know because I’m an endless consumer of much of it. The BBC gave us wonderful comedians like John Cleese and the Python crew, Ricky Gervais, Rowan Atkinson, and Fry & Laurie - all comedians influenced by the work of American forerunners - and endless wonderful documentaries about past European achievements; British theater gave us the more intelligent theater of Stoppard and Frayn and Bennett and David Hare and Peter Shaffer, as often as not about old subjects from European history; I adore lots of postwar European movies by Bergman, Fellini, Truffaut, Fassbinder, Polanski, Almodovar, Rohmer, Kieslowski and many others - usually either based on historical European subjects or heavily influenced by the work of American directors; I love cabaret Chaussoniers like Jacques Brel, Edith Piaff, Charles Aznavour, and Ute Lemper, who learned much of their craft by listening to American jazz crooners; like the rest of the world I love lots of British bands, most of whom would have not even thought to start a band if they hadn’t heard records by American bands first….. It’s all wonderful stuff, but it is either grounded in the paradigms of Old Europe, or it borrows from the American model. Like the pre-WWII generations of American popular culture, it is almost impossible to speak of European popular culture without taking account of the models they borrowed from across the Ocean. Even the professional sports leagues of Europe are marketed on models they borrowed from America.


But the show in Europe simply can’t compare to the show in America. Life is very dull when you run little risk of failure, and for those of us too restless to ever know inner peace, we require simply a better, longer, more diverse show to take our minds off our all-too-real problems. America simply has a more diverse offering of entertainment - an endless twenty-four hour cycle of frivolity in which the brain is in constant stimulation and needn’t be troubled by anything too burdensome. Some of these diversions even have the added benefit of having an intelligence which even a European could admire!


The profusion of American offerings, both intelligent and not so, is almost literally infinite. The celebrity culture known so well to the rest of the world is only the surface layer of American entertainment. Unlike in Europe, the dream of a centralized, national media is something of a joke. PBS and NPR receive a small fraction of the funding which the BBC or Deutschlandradio get, and even if they received the same funding, dollar for pound/euro, they could not do nearly as good a job at promoting all the best in American entertainment, because there is so much more in America than there is in Europe. As a result, no truly great musician or writer or artist in America can or ever again will be promoted with the firepower which their equivalents in Europe can be marketed. But as a result, and nobody likes to hear this, the brutality of the competition makes American artists more hungry and battle-tested. They have more to say thanks to the struggles they underwent to make it. But even if that isn’t true, it remains startlingly clear that there are far more great entertainers and artists working in America than in any one European country - because America is not a country, it is its own continent. Every scene, however small, has its stars; every consumer, however ignorant, has his favorites whom no one she knows has yet heard. No matter what your aesthetic taste, no matter what the shade of your political leanings, no matter how high or low your level of intelligence, there will be an astoundingly large number of people across the country who share your ethos and cater to it.


But there is no way to experience the extraordinary depth and diversity of this carnival without living here. No one would know how to cue you into everything which happens. You could never assimilate even a sliver of it if you didn’t. The dreams of Old Europe are merely dreams. But every damn city in America has its own small version of Old Vienna and and Old Paris and all the attendant cities of the fin de siecle. The music, the art, the writing, may be completely unrecognizable from its European forerunners, but as America streams headlong into second half of middle-age, it's finally carved out a distinct identity of its own - with each city having its own distinct and utterly individual identity-within-the-identity. No two communities, no two scenes in a single community, could ever be mistaken for one another. THIS is the American Carnival. It goes twenty-four hours a day, it has more stations than any carnival the world has ever seen, it contains endless other people to talk with about everything you just saw with, and it’s not going to close any time soon.  


10. This IS The American Century!


Welcome to the American Century. What did you expect it to be?


The twentieth century was not The American Century, it was The American Comedy. It began in 1914 with the assassination of Franz-Ferdinand, and ended in 1989 with the fall of the Berlin Wall. It had the happiest possible ending: The Soviet Union fell, America was the unquestioned world superpower, prosperous beyond the dreams of any country in world history, and America learned precisely the wrong lessons from their victory. We are now an an overstretched neo-imperial power, which believes it can tax minimally and spend maximally without being called to account for its debts. We believed that Reagan’s military bluster is what caused the downfall of the Soviet Union, when it was Harry Truman’s slow, patient policy of containment which brought it down over a period of forty years. It was a comedy because it left the country of perfect fools at the top of food chain, and like all fools, we now stand ready to get our comeuppance.


It is only in the twenty-first century that America bestrides the world like a colossus. Every country, every politically and intellectually active person, can be measured by one question before every other: What do you think of America? The story of the twenty-first century is how other countries accomodated the overwhelming influence of America on world policy and culture.


In the eyes of the world, America now stands for a caricature of what it is. To the eyes of foreigners who only have experience dealing with America’s spoiled privileged class and the hicks they see on TV, America is an imperial oligarchy which deliberately keeps its citizens dumb. Well... there’s no sense in denying that America is precisely that, but it’s also so much more. The majority of us Americans don’t deserve the fall which is coming to us. But fortunately, we may not be alive to see it happen. It very well might be a problem for when our grandchildren are old and grey. For the meantime, most Americans live in mountains of debt which don’t have to be paid, and privileges they haven’t earned. But that could all end tomorrow, in which the world will be plunged into chaos, in which case The Twenty-First Century will be defined as The American-Made Disaster. But it’s more likely to be a gradual fall, in which other countries have vested interests in keeping this fat middle-aged country propped up and barely alive for another hundred years, their economies growing in relation to America until these countries feel no need to prop up their ‘parent’ any longer, at which point there could be an Oedipal war in which America is soundly defeated, now merely a de-facto colony of a greater world power the way Europe in so many ways still is to America.

Welcome to The American Century! Did you expect it to be fun?
Read More
Posted in 800 Words, mini-essays, Politics | No comments

Monday, July 1, 2013

800 Words: 30 Mini-Essays (7. The Opportunism of Extremism, 8. The Baltimore/Washington Tragedy)

Posted on 1:36 PM by Unknown
7. The Opportunism of Extremism


Conveniently held beliefs are a wonderful enabler of success. Living as I have for much of my life in such close proximity to the nation's capital, I don’t doubt that if I could have held my nose and embraced the more noxious elements of left-wing belief, I could have had as  active a social and sex life over the years as so many of my more personably or physically attractive intellectual compares who are a few degrees to my left, rather than being a tolerated dissenting voice. More importantly, I don’t doubt that had I been able to hold my nose and embrace the more disgusting elements of American right-wingdom (which comprises most of it...), I’d have had as wonderful and influential a career as seems to burgeon for so many right-wing intellectuals I know.


Contrary to popular belief, there is no reward for contrarianism except for a few minutes in the spotlight and the belief that you’re correct. Whether or not people admit or realize it, they will do anything within their power to avoid disagreement, and they will do everything they can to avoid contact with people who challenge their belief. All socializing is a club, in which friends do everything they can to validate one another - because if we didn’t have validation, our sense of self would collapse. We’d all either become depressed or insane...


In leftist circles, the only reward in America is a social life. Even the rewards of the one reliably prosperous leftist vocation, academia, are steadily decreasing as they have for the half-century since leftist thought conquered academia. Most American leftists of an intellectual bent are stuck with the inadequate rewards of fighting losing battles at teaching on lower levels, or realizing artistic vision, or working at non-profit organizations for their pet causes. It’s a cliche to say that there is no organized Left in America, which is of course bollocks. There are plenty of leftist organizations in America whose voices are heard with little trouble, they’re just not well-organized. And consequently have very little influence on American life as a whole, and as such the careers of most left-wingers languish in unfulfillment.


Right-wingers, on the other hand, have all the rewards one can possibly ask for. They can have as great a social life as their leftist equivalents, but only if they’re not too busy reaping the obscenely delightful rewards of their beliefs in remuneration and influence. There are no end of career opportunities for American right-wingers of intellectual ability, for whom the world is nothing more an orange to squeeze so that they may enjoy the juice. And all the while, they will think that they rose because of their innate gifts, and that others who did not rise with their alacrity were prevented from doing so because of their innate laziness, moral corruption, and an intellectual limitedness that prevents them from realizing the true way of the world.


In this way, today’s intellectual right-wingers are no different than the Politburo bureaucrats of half-a-century ago, who no doubt found it equally easy to convince themselves that they rose up because of the depth of their commitment to ‘the people’, and that those who didn’t rise with the same speed were simply lacking in compassion for the plight of the worker.


In a dysfunctional society, what is most needed to rise very quickly is to parrot the beliefs which are squawked at you. The bosses at the most influential jobs are looking not for talent, but for inferior minds which can be molded like playdough. The minds of such people aren’t necessarily intellectually inferior (though I guess there’s an argument to be made...), they are inferior in terms of fortitude. They possess so little sense of self that whatever sense of self they have is connected to their movement, which is their best source of money, influence, privilege, and friends. They think not with their brains (because their lives would be much worse if they did), but with their hearts. And as such their beliefs are skin-deep. The best way to argue with them is not to refute their points intellectually, but to provide a right-winger with a left-winger to fall in love with, or to offer a left-winger a well-paid, secure job at a bank. The brain-washing would reverse itself in the drop of a hat, and their previously ‘cherished’ beliefs would melt into their precise opposites. Over and over again, I’ve seen it happen for so many people. Because these people never held their beliefs because of what their brains told them, but only because of what more primal organs did.


And oh... if only I could be one of either.... I’d be a much happier person.


8. The Baltimore/Washington Tragedy:


“City and Province — the two basic ideas of every civilization — bring up a wholly new form-problem of History, the very problem that we are living through today with hardly the remotest conception of its immensity. In place of a world, there is a city, a point, in which the whole life of broad regions is collecting while the rest dries up. In place of a type-true people, born of and grown on the soil, there is a new sort of nomad, cohering unstably in fluid masses, the parasitical city dweller, traditionless, utterly matter-of-fact, religionless, clever, unfruitful, deeply contemptuous of the countryman and especially that highest form of countryman, the country gentleman. This is a very great stride towards the inorganic, towards the end —what does it signify? France and England have already taken the step and Germany is beginning to do so. After Syracuse, Athens, and Alexandria comes Rome. After Madrid, Paris, London come Berlin and New York. It is the destiny of whole regions that lie outside the radiation-circle of one of these cities — of old Crete and Macedon and to-day the Scandinavian North — to become "provinces." Of old, the field on which the opposed conception of an epoch came to battle was some world-problem of a metaphysical, religious or dogmatic kind, and the battle was between the soil-genius of the countryman (noble, priest) and the "worldly " patrician genius of the famous old small towns of Doric or Gothic springtime. Of such a character were the conflicts over the Dionysus religion — as in the tyranny of Kleisthenes of Sikyon — and those of the Reformation in the German free cities and the Huguenot wars. But just as these cities overcame the country-side (already it is a purely civic world-outlook that appears in even Parmenides and Descartes), so in turn the world-city overcame them. It is the common intellectual process of later periods such as the Ionic and the Baroque, and to-day — as in the Hellenistic age which at its outset saw the foundation of artificial, land-alien Alexandria — Culture-cities like Florence, Nurnberg, Salamanca, Bruges and Prag, have become provincial towns and fight inwardly a lost battle against the world-cities. The worldcity means cosmopolitanism in place of "home” cold matter-of-fact in place of reverence for tradition and age, scientific irreligion as a fossil representative of the older religion of the heart, society in place of the state, natural instead of hard-earned rights. It was in the conception of money as an inorganic and abstract magnitude, entirely disconnected from the notion of the fruitful earth and the primitive values, that the Romans had the advantage of the Greeks. Thenceforward any high ideal of life becomes largely a question of money. Unlike the Greek stoicism of Chrysippus, the Roman stoicism of Cato and Seneca presupposes a private income; and, unlike that of the 18th Century, the social-ethical sentiment of the xoth, if it is to be realized at a higher level than that of professional (and lucrative) agitation, is a matter for millionaires. To the world-city belongs not a folk but a mass. Its uncomprehending hostility to all the traditions representative of the Culture (nobility, church, privileges, dynasties, convention in art and limits of knowledge in science), the keen and cold intelligence that confounds the wisdom of the peasant, the new-fashioned naturalism that in relation to all matters of sex and society goes back far beyond Rousseau and Socrates to quite primitive instincts and conditions, the reappearance of the panem et circenses in the form of wage-disputes and football-grounds — all these things betoken the definite closing-down of the Culture and the opening of a quite new phase of human existence — anti-provincial, late, futureless, but quite inevitable.”


- Oswald Spengler “The Decline of the West”


I now know that I was a different person than I was four years ago when I drove through Washington DC and saw Sherman Avenue around Columbia Heights. Just four years ago, it was still a slum - dimly lit with boarded up townhouses. You did not walk there at night, and if you could help it, you wouldn’t drive there either. It’s now a pristine avenue of upper-middle class living, with streetlights so bright that it’s a twenty-four hour daytime. As I drove by, I blurted out ‘Are you shitting me?!?’


Every time I drive through Washington, there is another part of town that’s completely cleaned up. It’s barely even remarkable anymore. Neighborhoods I daren’t drive through when I was in college I now walk through without a second thought. At its current rate, the entire city will be upper-middle-class habitable by the time I’m forty, perhaps it all is already.


Rome was not built in a day, but Washington looks to be built in a matter of hours. The rest of the country grows ever more decrepit, more divided, more slummified. What we called The Great Recession may be the new Great Reality for the next hundred years in which jobs grow ever more scarce, student loans harder to pay off, the middle class gradually shrinks to nothing, and the gap between rich and poor becomes unbridgeable. But Washington is the one city in America which is recession proof. The bigger the government grows, the more lobbies and non-profits grow around it, the more educated people feel the need to move in, and the more vibrant DC’s economy grows. Washington is the city whose streets are paved with other people’s Gold.


What we seem to see in Washington DC is nothing less than the unstoppable construction of an imperium. It’s little different than the 19th century reconstruction of Berlin. No matter how important politically, and occasionally intellectually, Berlin was a sleepy, provincial town of little consequence to the development of mankind. When encountering the splendors of old Paris, London, Madrid, Rome, Vienna, even Stockholm and Amsterdam, Berliners might as well have been country bumpkins. It was only when Berlin had other people’s money to grow itself that the city became the Bismark-era capital of the world, Earth’s most important city. When Prussia united Germany under the Second Reich, the other great German cities - each previously the capital of its own principality - grew ever more trival and poor. But Berlin became the shining economic, intellectual, and cultural light of the German-speaking world. So important was Berlin to Germany’s growth that by the 1920’s when the Weimar Republic gave Germany hyper-inflation such as the world had never seen, Berlin had finally reached the peak of its influence upon the world. Not even Vienna, Paris, or even New York could compare to Berlin’s cultural reach. And Berlin is the model for the new Washington, which is just beginning to stretch its wings into the most important American city and the nation’s true capital. In a half-century, its power over our nation could dwarf even New York’s. We can oppose it if we like, but what good is that against the tide of history?


In 1800, Baltimore was the second-largest city in America - a mercantile metropolis which housed perhaps the most important granaries in the New World, and a shipping center which imported and exported more food and sugar than any place in early America. Short of Philadelphia or Boston, and maybe Charleston, there is not a single city in America whose history goes further back into the roots of this nation. Early Washington DC was destroyed in the War of 1812, but it was in Baltimore that America repelled England’s efforts to subdue the new American nation and perhaps bring it back into the fold of the British Empire. And at that moment came the climax of Baltimore’s long history, initiating a decline in the city’s fortunes which is soon to enter its third century.


I used to hate Baltimore with a throbbing passion and swore I would never return. To me, Baltimore was all those things which are backward about America. Like an old-school Brooklynite to Manhattan, or an Oaklander to San Francisco, I looked at Washington DC as a shining beacon of progress against the stagnant regression I saw all around me. Washington DC may have been no better than Baltimore in terms of crime, drugs, and disease, but time was on Washington’s side. By the time I was in college, it was obviously the model of a vibrant, growing metropolis which Baltimore so clearly wasn’t. There were no end of outdoor restaurants, the city didn’t feel completely deserted after the end of the workday, there was an extraordinary profusion of gorgeous architecture, important thinkers of all fields were constantly lecturing around town, there was more theater, more art galleries, more concerts of nearly all genres, it was greener and more bike-friendly, and there was easier access to art-films. Most significantly, Washington DC had an industry! Until the sixties, Baltimore was a steel-manufacturing town, but it even lost its blue-collar reason for being. Baltimore was an ugly city with only the power of Johns Hopkins to sustain it, but Hopkins alone does not a vibrant city make. DC was a government town, and therefore has a constant influx of educated people. Even if the city was too transient and anonymous, it was always exciting. You felt that you were at one of the epicenters of the American Carnival, in one of the cities that makes America the most exciting place on Earth.


People who moved to Baltimore and see only a contemporary bastion of quirkiness for privileged white people can never understand what Baltimore was like when my generation was growing up. The Wire isn’t just a show, and the Baltimore of that era might as well be synonymous with downward mobility, hidebound conventionality, segregation at its most poisonous, gated community privilege, and utter distrust of progress. It had all of DC’s problems and none of its advantages. Even if things have improved, it’s still a lot like that today. And if there is a superficial gloss of ‘weirdness’ in which people feel so free to be ‘themselves’, it’s because the city around it hasn’t noticed: at its heart, Baltimore is as backwardly conventional a place as exists in America. As an adolescent, I viewed this city as a prison, and in some ways, I still do. Yes, Baltimore has all the identity which DC lacks, but that identity is a chain.

I may never return to live Washington DC, but I left an important part of myself in that city, perhaps the best part. But if the identity of Baltimore is a chain, then perhaps the identity of DC is an apparition. Only gadflies like me can make themselves at home in a city like DC, no one else can, because it’s an identity based upon skepticism. The things I love about DC, the dissatisfaction with a slow-moving life of simple pleasures, the constant spectacle of encounters with ‘celebrities’ (at least of a certain sort), the horror felt at the idea of living an inconsequential life, the cynical spurning of so long established institutions like families and rootedness and traditional morality (even as it's often so celebrated), the feeling that you are where important things happen, are precisely the reasons why DC cows any person with a healthy sense of self. Anyone who feels at home in DC is either a person of immensely little identity or immensely low expectations. I left DC because my low expectations were confirmed, and it was impossible to build a meaningful life in a place that valued my abilities so little.

If life were lived the way it should, it would be possible for these two opposite cities to coalesce into something truly livable. A place where belief and skepticism go hand in hand, a place of both dynamism and rootedness, a place with all the benefits of both provincial and cosmopolitan life. But unfortunately, my life, for a time, will remain an hour-long drive to capture those two sides of life, and of myself. But such a place does not exist in America. Does it exist anywhere else?
Read More
Posted in 800 Words, baltimore, mini-essays, Politics | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • 800 Words: The Failed Classical Revolution - Part 3
    Another week passes, and I’m still the director of Kol Rinah. If you have musical ability, there really isn’t much to being a good conductor...
  • 800 Words: 30 Mini-Essays (7. The Opportunism of Extremism, 8. The Baltimore/Washington Tragedy)
    7. The Opportunism of Extremism Conveniently held beliefs are a wonderful enabler of success. Living as I have for much of my life in such c...
  • 800 Words: The Disorganized Imagination of Leos Janacek
    I have a mind that goes into overdrive all too easily. I find that if I don’t write something – something long - every day, I spend whole ho...
  • 800 Words: Culture of Offense
    Jason Alexander is not Michael Richards, after spending my youth watching Seinfeld on loop, I can tell you definitively that Michael Richard...
  • 800 Contrarian Words about Ray Bradbury
    Instantly we’re aboard a frozen ship, thousands of degrees below absolute zero, built with refrigerating capacity that can withstand the mos...
  • 800 Words: The Aaron Sorkin Problem - Part 4
    Seventy years ago, Aaron Sorkin would have been screenwriter to the giants - a writer who can write eloquent dialogue beyond our wildest ima...
  • 800 Words: The Proms Wakes Me Up
    Had I returned to London any year before this one, reacclimation would have been easier, perhaps instant. For seven years after I lived he...
  • 800 Words: More Cultural Heresies on Composers (1700-1900)
    -           By and large, Bach’s instrumental music – dominated by his unmatchable sense of form - is almost infinitely more interesting tha...
  • 800 Words: The Ideal Band: co-written by Hector Berlioz (part 1)
    (The ideal orchestra of the 1830’s in action) The orchestra may be thought of as a large instrument that is capable of producing simultaneou...
  • Sight and Sound Movie List - Der Mazur
    Wow, this was hard. I've watched a lot of movies, and had a lot of VERY STRONG opinions on movies, but I actually don't like to rank...

Categories

  • 10 Years Ago (1)
  • 10 Years Ago... (2)
  • 800 Words (146)
  • A Post-Wedding Brunch Fight About Barbara Jordan (2)
  • Aaron Sorkin (3)
  • Almanac (6)
  • assimilation (1)
  • Bach (1)
  • Bad Culture (1)
  • Ballet (2)
  • baltimore (2)
  • Beethoven (2)
  • Benny Goodman (1)
  • Berlin Philharmonic (3)
  • Berlioz (2)
  • best of the year 2012 (4)
  • Bob Dylan (1)
  • books (8)
  • Brahms (1)
  • Breaking Bad (1)
  • Carl Sagan (1)
  • Choral Music (1)
  • Christian Thielemann (1)
  • Colin Davis (1)
  • Comedy (3)
  • Daniel Barenboim (2)
  • Daniele Gatti (1)
  • Dave Brubeck (1)
  • David Bowie (1)
  • Dialogues (4)
  • Dreams of My Mother (3)
  • Duke Ellington (2)
  • Dvorak (1)
  • Elton John (1)
  • Eric Hoffer (1)
  • Fiction (2)
  • football (1)
  • Frank Martin (1)
  • Friday Playlist (34)
  • Gennadi Rozhdestvensky (1)
  • Giovanni Verga (1)
  • Goethe (1)
  • Golijov (1)
  • Guest Post (25)
  • gunther schuller (1)
  • Happiness - The Mortal Enemy (3)
  • history (38)
  • Isaiah Berlin (2)
  • Israel (5)
  • Italo Svevo (1)
  • James Levine (1)
  • Janacek (2)
  • Jazz (7)
  • Jewish Intolerance (4)
  • Judaism (12)
  • karl bohm (1)
  • Larry David (1)
  • Leonard Bernstein (3)
  • Les Miserables (2)
  • Louis Armstrong (2)
  • Louis CK (2)
  • Mad Men (2)
  • Mahler (1)
  • Marvin Hamlisch (1)
  • mengelberg (1)
  • Middle East (4)
  • mini-essays (4)
  • Movies (9)
  • Mozart (1)
  • Mstislav Rostropovich (1)
  • Musical Obituaries (6)
  • Must See TV (2)
  • My Cultural Heresies (7)
  • My Favorite Album (22)
  • Neil Young (1)
  • Non-Classical Music (44)
  • Obama (7)
  • opera (3)
  • Otis Redding (1)
  • Paavo Jarvi (2)
  • philosophy (14)
  • Poetry (1)
  • Politics (43)
  • Pollini (1)
  • Quote of the Day (11)
  • ragtime (1)
  • Random Youtube Crap (4)
  • Randy Newman (1)
  • Ravel (1)
  • Ray Charles (1)
  • Religion (22)
  • Riccardo Chailly (1)
  • Rolling Stone's Top 50 (3)
  • Roosevelt (2)
  • Schubert (2)
  • Schutz (1)
  • Science (3)
  • scott joplin (1)
  • Seinfeld (3)
  • Semyon Bychkov (1)
  • Shakespeare (1)
  • Sight and Sound Movie List (21)
  • Simon Rattle (2)
  • songs (1)
  • Soul: The American Music (2)
  • Star Wars (1)
  • Stephen Sondheim (3)
  • Stravinsky (1)
  • Sufjan Stevens (1)
  • The American Utopia (2)
  • The Best Songwriter There Is (1)
  • The Eurasian Faultline (2)
  • The Failed Classical Revolution (2)
  • The Middle East (5)
  • The Productivity of Suffering (3)
  • The Sopranos (1)
  • theater (7)
  • Thomas Beecham (1)
  • To My 19 and 24 Year Old Political Selves (6)
  • Travel (8)
  • TV (7)
  • Verdi (1)
  • vienna philharmonic (1)
  • Visual Art (2)
  • Vladimir Jurowski (1)
  • Wagner (3)
  • Werner Herzog (1)
  • What Inspires You (4)
  • Why Impressionism is a Buzzkill (2)
  • Why Religion Always Wins (4)
  • Why Violence (1)
  • Wilhelm Furtwangler (1)
  • Woody Allen (1)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (126)
    • ▼  September (4)
      • 800 Words: Monotheism and the Grand Chessboard
      • Rosh Hashana Playlist
      • 800 Words: Vitality
      • 800 Words: The Complete Season's Greetings
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (14)
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (34)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (12)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ►  2012 (174)
    • ►  December (15)
    • ►  November (18)
    • ►  October (15)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (9)
    • ►  July (15)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (47)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile